Loading
Compare the two win rates. A large gap between them means no-decision is your real competitor, and that is a qualification problem rather than a selling one.
Two win rates are shown because they answer different questions. Excluding no-decision flatters you and is the number most teams quote; including it is what the pipeline actually did. The by-value rate matters when your deal sizes vary — winning many small deals and losing the large ones reads as a healthy win rate.
Shows win rate by count and by value, and separates genuine losses from deals that went nowhere.
Every figure it produces is arithmetic on what you enter, and the working is shown line by line rather than summarised into a single number.
Replace the defaults with your own figures. They are examples chosen to make the shape obvious, not benchmarks — using them unchanged tells you about a company that is not yours.
The lines beneath the headline are the useful part: they show which input is driving the result, which is what makes the answer arguable in a good way.
Two win rates are shown because they answer different questions. Excluding no-decision flatters you and is the number most teams quote; including it is what the pipeline actually did. The by-value rate matters when your deal sizes vary — winning many small deals and losing the large ones reads as a healthy win rate.
Where two readings of the same question exist, both are shown rather than one being chosen for you. That is deliberate — the difference between them is usually the thing worth discussing.
If a figure looks wrong, change the input you least believe and watch what moves. That is faster than checking the arithmetic.
No. The tool runs in the page, nothing is sent anywhere, and there is no follow-up.
No. They are examples chosen to make the shape clear. Use your own figures.
It is stated in the working shown beneath the result, so you can check it rather than trust it.
Half an hour on your own figures, and an honest answer about the parts Treepie does not improve.