Loading
Because a renewal is an event a year away, and the only thing holding it is a calendar entry owned by one person. They move team, the entry moves with them, and the client finds out at renewal that nobody called.
The same applies to mid-term adjustments, which are remembered rather than recorded.
Each policy sits against the client with its inception, renewal and premium, and the renewal is a dated record rather than a reminder. Ninety days out it appears in a queue with an owner and a clock, like any other piece of work.
Every change to a policy keeps its previous value, which is the part a compliance review actually asks for.
It does not rate risk and it does not quote from insurer panels. It holds the client, the policy and the conversation; the pricing comes from wherever it comes from now.
And it makes no claim about your regulatory obligations. It records what you did, thoroughly, which is a prerequisite for demonstrating compliance rather than a substitute for it.
The audit trail answers who changed what and when, including changes made through the API. Demands and needs, the advice given and the date it was given are on the record rather than in a mailbox.
Books reconciles premium against commission received, so a shortfall is visible in the month rather than at year end.
Products, not integrations. Each one reads the same record, so a join is a permission rather than a sync job with a mapping screen behind it.
Yes, each with its own renewal, premium and history, rolled up on the client record.
Books does, against the policy, so expected and received can be compared.
No. Not by anyone, including administrators — which is what makes it worth having.
Half an hour on your own numbers is usually enough to say whether Flow is the right place to start.