Loading
Most accounting guides describe a clean migration and a five-day close. Neither is typical, and pretending otherwise makes the guide useless at exactly the moment somebody needs it.
These name the decisions that are expensive to reverse — chart structure, dimensions, rate basis — and say plainly which ones to take slowly.
Sequenced, not alphabetised. Each one ends with something configured.
The recurring point is that structure decided badly is expensive forever. A chart that sprawls, dimensions added after the fact, cost rates that ignore non-productive time — each is cheap to get right at setup and painful to correct later.
Rates and recovery is the one most firms have never done properly, because it needs a cost rate built on available hours rather than contracted ones, and that number is uncomfortable.
Chasing without damaging the relationship is the odd one out: it is about people rather than structure, and it is the guide with the clearest return.
Every guide is written to be finished rather than to be impressive: the screen each decision happens on, and the thing that goes wrong if you skip it.
Books tools →If you are implementing, read ledger and tax setup before touching anything. It is the guide whose decisions you cannot cheaply undo.
If your close is the problem, read your first invoice run and chasing without damaging the relationship, in that order.
No. They are written to be useful against whatever you run today. Several describe decisions that apply to any books-shaped system, not just ours.
Each has an owner and a review date. Where something has changed, the guide is updated rather than supplemented, so there is one current version rather than a thread of corrections.
Because the limits are the useful part. A guide that recommends everything is a brochure, and the decisions worth taking care over are usually the ones with a real cost either way.
Half an hour with your own data usually saves reading three of these. The guides will still be here afterwards.