Loading
Because the reporting is designed to be reassuring. Rankings improve, impressions rise, and none of it answers whether the work produced customers — which is the only question a founder is really asking.
Without a way to check, the choice is to trust the agency or to ignore the channel, and both are expensive.
Organic performance is followed to closed revenue in Books, so the channel is judged on money rather than on position. A page that produced three customers and one that produced four thousand impressions are distinguishable.
The opportunity backlog is a short ordered list with the evidence for each item shown, so you can see why something is first rather than being told.
It will not do SEO. It measures, prioritises and briefs; the writing, the building and the outreach are still work somebody has to do.
And it will not deliver quickly. Search is slow, and any tool that implies otherwise is selling something.
You are reading the same records they are, so the conversation is about priorities rather than about whether the numbers are real.
And where the work is genuinely good, it becomes visible sooner, which tends to help the relationship rather than strain it.
Products, not integrations. Each one reads the same record, so a join is a permission rather than a sync job with a mapping screen behind it.
Yes, where the source carries through to a closed deal in Books.
No. It gives you and them the same evidence to work from.
Slow. Search always is; the tooling does not change that.
Half an hour on your own numbers is usually enough to say whether Growth is the right place to start.