Loading
Because the backlog is built from keyword research and the archive is built from history, and nobody joins them. A perfectly good brief is written for a term the company already ranks for with a three-year-old post.
The new piece then splits the signal, both pages drop, and the honest conclusion — that the old one should have been updated — arrives a quarter later.
Keyword-to-page mapping shows what each term is already served by, and cannibalisation detection names the pages competing. A brief starts from that rather than from a blank keyword list.
Content analysis and content gaps distinguish between something missing and something that exists and is underperforming, which are different jobs.
It will not write, and the briefs are a specification rather than a draft. Nothing is generated on your behalf.
And it will not settle an editorial argument. It supplies the evidence about what is already there, which usually shortens the argument.
The opportunity backlog is ordered by evidence, and the priority matrix weighs effort against what a cluster has actually produced — so updating three existing pages can legitimately outrank writing a new one.
Each page has its own record, so the effect of an update is visible rather than assumed.
No. It produces briefs and priorities; the writing is yours.
Often, yes — that is what the evidence usually supports.
Yes, each page has its own performance record.
Half an hour on your own numbers is usually enough to say whether Growth is the right place to start.