Loading
Because every client report is assembled by hand from three tools. It takes a senior person half a day per client per month, and it is the least valuable thing they do.
Worse, it is hard to defend under questioning, because the numbers came from tools the client can also open and read differently.
Each client is a property with its own page records, clusters, backlog and history. Reporting reads that record, so it is current and traceable to specific pages and changes.
Work logged in Loop against those pages gives cost against return per client.
It will not manage client access for you beyond the permissions you set.
It also will not standardise clients that genuinely differ — each property keeps its own clusters and competitor set.
Reporting becomes a review rather than an assembly, and it survives scrutiny because every figure drills to a page and a date.
Profitability per client is visible, which usually reveals that the smallest accounts consume the most senior time.
Products, not integrations. Each one reads the same record, so a join is a permission rather than a sync job with a mapping screen behind it.
Yes, scoped to their property.
Internally, yes, for capacity and profitability.
Reports carry your branding.
Half an hour on your own numbers is usually enough to say whether Growth is the right place to start.