Loading
Into monthly reports. A dozen clients, each assembled by hand from three tools, is a week of unbillable time every month — and the first thing to slip when a month is busy.
When it slips, the client's next email asks what is happening, which costs more than the report would have.
Search Console and analytics data attach to page records, and source tracking carries organic traffic through to closed revenue where the client's deals are recorded.
So a report is a view of live records per client rather than a compilation, and it is current on the day it is read.
It will not write the commentary, which is the part with the value. It removes the assembly so the time goes into the analysis.
And it cannot report revenue the client does not record. Where deals live elsewhere, the join comes through the API.
Reporting in enquiries and revenue rather than positions ends the value conversation instead of starting it.
And because the client can be shown the same records, the discussion moves to priorities rather than to whether the numbers are real.
Yes, with per-client separation and its own records.
Where the client's deals are recorded, yes — through to closed revenue.
No. The assembly is; the analysis is yours.
We will run it end to end on your own numbers in half an hour, and tell you honestly which parts Treepie does not improve.