Loading
Where days exceed your policy cap, the capped figure is the one to use. Both are shown rather than one applied silently.
Encashment rules differ by leave type and by what the applicable law permits — earned leave and casual leave are not treated alike, and merging them into one balance produces the wrong answer at exit. The divisor and the salary components are policy choices within legal limits, so both are inputs. Tax treatment is outside this entirely.
Works out encashment from the salary basis and days you supply, against your policy cap.
Every figure it produces is arithmetic on what you enter, and the working is shown line by line rather than summarised into a single number.
Replace the defaults with your own figures. They are examples chosen to make the shape obvious, not benchmarks — using them unchanged tells you about a company that is not yours.
The lines beneath the headline are the useful part: they show which input is driving the result, which is what makes the answer arguable in a good way.
Encashment rules differ by leave type and by what the applicable law permits — earned leave and casual leave are not treated alike, and merging them into one balance produces the wrong answer at exit. The divisor and the salary components are policy choices within legal limits, so both are inputs. Tax treatment is outside this entirely.
Where two readings of the same question exist, both are shown rather than one being chosen for you. That is deliberate — the difference between them is usually the thing worth discussing.
If a figure looks wrong, change the input you least believe and watch what moves. That is faster than checking the arithmetic.
No. The tool runs in the page, nothing is sent anywhere, and there is no follow-up.
No. They are examples chosen to make the shape clear. Use your own figures.
It is stated in the working shown beneath the result, so you can check it rather than trust it.
Half an hour on your own figures, and an honest answer about the parts Treepie does not improve.