Loading
Because review tools need their own org structure, which is stale by the second cycle. So somebody exports the org chart, builds a sheet and chases it.
A structured cycle in which managers and employees assess performance against objectives, with a recorded outcome.
Cycles run against the reporting line Nest already holds, so who reviews whom needs no configuration. Outcomes attach to the personnel record.
Three years later, a compensation revision points to the review that supported it. The question of why somebody is paid what they are paid has an answer.
It does not force a distribution or rank people against each other, and it does not calculate a performance score.
Compensation revisions can reference a review. Learning records show what development was agreed.
Yes.
Yes, as part of the cycle.
Yes, on different schedules if you need them.
Fourteen days, every module, no card. Or half an hour with someone who will run it on your own records and tell you where it does not help.