Loading
Because they are a list of thousands of domains with an authority score attached. Nobody has time to assess them, and the ones at the top are usually places no human decision-maker could get a link from anyway.
So the report is exported, glanced at, and outreach happens from a different list entirely.
It compares who links to comparable pages on competitor sites against who links to yours, and shows the difference for the clusters you actually care about.
Sources are grouped by kind — directory, editorial, community, partner — so an achievable list can be separated from an aspirational one.
Outreach has a reason. Rather than "we would like a link", it is a specific page that answers a specific question a specific publication has already covered.
It also shows where a competitor's advantage on a cluster is a link advantage rather than a content one, which changes what you do about it.
It will not build links, and it does not offer to. Anything that sells link building alongside link analysis is selling the thing that gets sites penalised.
It also does not score domains on an invented authority scale. It shows who links, to what, and what those pages rank for.
Nothing here is an integration. Each line is two products reading the same record from different sides.
It compares who links to comparable pages on competitor sites against who links to yours, and shows the difference for the clusters you actually care about.
Outreach has a reason. Rather than "we would like a link", it is a specific page that answers a specific question a specific publication has already covered.
It will not build links, and it does not offer to. Anything that sells link building alongside link analysis is selling the thing that gets sites penalised.
Fourteen days, every module, no card. Or half an hour with someone who will run it on your own records and tell you where it does not help.