Loading
Because they return four thousand issues on a five-hundred-page site. Most are on pages nobody visits, ranked by a severity scale that has no idea which pages matter.
The report is circulated, admired and never worked through, because there is no honest way to start.
The crawl runs against the same page records that carry impressions and clicks. Issues are ordered by the traffic and revenue of the page they sit on, so the top of the list is the top of the list for a reason.
Metadata, structured data and internal linking are checked as part of the same pass, against what those pages are meant to rank for.
The list becomes finite. Eleven issues on pages that earn something, rather than four thousand across everything.
Fixes become measurable: the page record shows the issue, the fix date and what impressions did afterwards, on one timeline.
It will not fix anything. It finds and prioritises; the change happens in your site, and Growth records when it did.
It also will not promise that fixing an issue moves a ranking. Some do, most do not, and Growth shows the before and after rather than claiming credit.
Nothing here is an integration. Each line is two products reading the same record from different sides.
The crawl runs against the same page records that carry impressions and clicks. Issues are ordered by the traffic and revenue of the page they sit on, so the top of the list is the top of the list for a reason.
The list becomes finite. Eleven issues on pages that earn something, rather than four thousand across everything.
It will not fix anything. It finds and prioritises; the change happens in your site, and Growth records when it did.
Fourteen days, every module, no card. Or half an hour with someone who will run it on your own records and tell you where it does not help.